Board Thread:Movie discussions/@comment-252417-20190205141753/@comment-252417-20190307124246

I appreciate anyone's time they take to talk about their work, but I still have to disagree with WB and Tim Sheridan's decisions what worked and didn't work, and it just proves to me that they didn't really know what they were doing. WB gave Sheridan instructs on what he could and couldn't do, which I find to be all wrong. Like the ghosts and such being real, but WB wanting to keep it ambiguous, but they're reviving part of the franchise that was 100% non-ambiguous, and shying away from Scrappy, BUT Sheridan made sure to make a joke about Scrappy. You either have Scrappy or you don't, you don't make him ambiguous just to make the plot more confusing than it needs to be. Velma's reaction could've been "It's a long story..." so it keeps the potential open. If they had kept Sheridan on for the next film, then he could have worked more on that. Ironically, I've seen worse films in the franchise, but it's screwed up choices and inconsistencies that spoil the film. Either they need to hire real people who can put together a success or sell off the franchise (and all of Hanna-Barbera) to another company who can.