Board Thread:In the News/@comment-252417-20140628002826

Not so long ago it was announced that a big screen adventure of Scooby-Doo was in the works this time in animated form. Funny thing is it had people involved in previous live-action forays in both formats.

Now the studio has announced they're bringing a wholly new live-action film to the big screen. It still has Charles Roven producing (although Richard Suckle has been dropped), with Atlas Entertainment working on production. The only difference is they have a new writer, Randall Green. Was the first news intentionally false or did they change their minds? Nobody knows. Makes me wonder if that new animated theatrical Flintstones film announced will just end up being a new live-action attempt?

I think it's obvious what we want to see in a live-action film to make it worth seeing (and making), but what is it you want to see specifically done that wasn't done right or shouldn't have been done at all? 