Thread:Someoneelsesproblem/@comment-252417-20160225044804/@comment-27613406-20160226035354

OK, I'm back. More thoughts.

I definitely like your proposed definition for the category better than the current one, which just says "characters that are much larger than normal size", which is too vague (does "normal size" mean human size, larger than what is normal for a given species, or what?).