Thread:RavenclawDBS/@comment-233389-20151227042626/@comment-233389-20151228193510

RavenclawDBS wrote: I'd just like to state that whilst I don't agree with absolutely everything possible says, generally there is always logic and for the images I would concur the best quality source possible is most important; i.e iTunes as opposed to YouTube. Blurry images generally make the page look worse, not better.

As for text edits I personally see nothing wrong with more detail...however I'm not fully sure of the issue as possible is much quicker to react than me.

Personally, I value all edits made with the intention of improving the wiki, reverted or not; it's only vandalism I'm opposed to. At the end of the day though, it's the admins' call how the wiki is run and appears.

- DBS I understand that and agree with that. I've been on both sides(user and admin) of dozens of discussions about various things on dozens of wikis. This is the first time I've seen an admin get mad and start raging because I asked him to define a policy. It makes no sense to me whatsoever for an admin to be unwilling to tell a user what he expects the user to do.