Thread:Anythingspossibleforapossible/@comment-1195935-20170204054821/@comment-1195935-20170205190320

Voice Chasers is a volunteer-run website (it says so on the staff about page), largely user submitted information, which I would very much doubt the validity that they were able to verify they indeed spoke with Janet Waldo (when she was allowed) and verified her birth date. I tihnk it's possible they were contacted by someone claiming to be her but I would strongly question how much due diligence they did to in fact identify the individal.

On the other hand, notable publications that have a long history of fact checking, such a the New York Times, LA Times, and so forth all reported in her obituary that she was born in 1920 and died at the age of 96.

http://www.latimes.com/local/obituaries/la-me-janet-waldo-20160613-snap-story.html

http://people.com/tv/jetsons-star-janet-waldo-dies-actress-who-voiced-judy-jetson-is-dead-at-96/

http://www.today.com/popculture/janet-waldo-voice-judy-jetson-dies-96-t97976

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/janet-waldo-dead-dies_us_575efd12e4b071ec19eea829

If it's the choice of the editors at Scoobypedia to ignore reliable sources for fan run websites like Voice Chasers, then that's your perogative as a local community. It's not something I would interfere with beyond leaving a single message. When it comes to the English Wikipedia, we have a much high degree of standards for information, including using reliable sources. If that creates a discrepency between the two projects then I understand how that could create some contention. When it comes to editing content on the English Wikipedia, you will however have to abide by our standards and practices which would mean acknowledging that our standards and procedures would heavily support the referenced information in major publications as cited.

Anyyway, best of luck and I think in terms of being let down -- that might go both ways.